The project is mega cloudy. Information about tokens is very difficult to find, even though it is really needed because the system is unusual and complicated for me.
Any questions about tokens and tokenomics to support remain unanswered for 4 days.
The timeline is not clear, there are a billion holes in the whitepaper. I don't know what they hope for with this attitude.
The main source of hype is giving the AI self-consciousness and giving it control rights. If this is possible, then definitely not in the near future and definitely not without total control over the actions of the AI.
I simply do not know what I am going to invest in, how can I keep interest to the project if the information has to be literally pulled out of the mouths of the developers?

SophiaVERSE starts with NFT-based gameplay and marketplace and evolves into a full-fledged environment and API for games integration into the multiverse.

SophiaVERSE

The project is mega cloudy. Information about tokens is very difficult to find, even though it is really needed because the system is unusual and complicated for me. 
Any questions about tokens and tokenomics to support remain unanswered for 4 days.
The timeline is not clear, there are a billion holes in the whitepaper. I don't know what they hope for with this attitude. 
The main source of hype is giving the AI self-consciousness and giving it control rights. If this is possible, then definitely not in the near future and definitely not without total control over the actions of the AI. 
I simply do not know what I am going to invest in, how can I keep interest to the project if the information has to be literally pulled out of the mouths of the developers?

Eugene

A 1-star rating? Why LB??? Let me start by saying that, for me, the system is unclear and unnecessarily complex. I can't think of any reason for this complexity. This opinion also includes the fact that the distribution and vesting periods are unknown at this point.

SophiaVerse has multiple layers of tokenomics and digital assets.

The first layer is SOPH, used for all in-game transactions, staking to earn SOPH and GUARD, and accessing skills and specific tasks and get acces to their lending protocol.

GUARD is the second token. These tokens will be rewarded to stakers, but the exact amount is unknown as they intend to give this token to Sophia Humanoid when she achieves self-consciousness, allowing her to control her own destiny.

Then there is a layer of NFTs that keep track of your digital assets (weapons, land, gear, etc.), along with the Hivermind NFTs, which represent the state of Sophia's development. This is done using 10,000 connectors and 7,777 functional NFTs (the system behind this is unknown to me). Ultimately, when Sophia does reach self-consciousness, it will be represented by a single NFT called "the Singularity."

For those who think this is all, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but there is another layer !
AGIX ecosystem tokens are part of a decentralized platform for AI development. It appears that SophiaVerse will not be solely developed by the creators of Sophia, as they rely on the efforts of this platform as well. A key aspect of this token is that it serves as the premium currency within their metaverse. However, they have no control over that token or its utility, which, in my opinion, is a bad move.

A 1-star rating? Why LB??? Let me start by saying that, for me, the system is unclear and unnecessarily complex. I can't think of any reason for this complexity. This opinion also includes the fact that the distribution and vesting periods are unknown at this point.

SophiaVerse has multiple layers of tokenomics and digital assets. 

The first layer is SOPH, used for all in-game transactions, staking to earn SOPH and GUARD, and accessing skills and specific tasks and get acces to their lending protocol.

GUARD is the second token. These tokens will be rewarded to stakers, but the exact amount is unknown as they intend to give this token to Sophia Humanoid when she achieves self-consciousness, allowing her to control her own destiny.

Then there is a layer of NFTs that keep track of your digital assets (weapons, land, gear, etc.), along with the Hivermind NFTs, which represent the state of Sophia's development. This is done using 10,000 connectors and 7,777 functional NFTs (the system behind this is unknown to me). Ultimately, when Sophia does reach self-consciousness, it will be represented by a single NFT called "the Singularity."

For those who think this is all, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but there is another layer !
AGIX ecosystem tokens are part of a decentralized platform for AI development. It appears that SophiaVerse will not be solely developed by the creators of Sophia, as they rely on the efforts of this platform as well. A key aspect of this token is that it serves as the premium currency within their metaverse. However, they have no control over that token or its utility, which, in my opinion, is a bad move.

When you read their website, it's not really clear what they are creating. From what I understand, it is a metaverse centered around the humanoid Sophia. The purpose is to help her train, collect data, and improve by adding a gamification layer.

However, it's not clear what kind of game it is. Is it an MMORPG, a first-person shooter, a battle royale, or something else entirely? I can't really tell, even after going through their whitepaper 2.0. Terms like "play-to-earn" and "learn-to-earn" are mentioned, but the specific type of gameplay they are focusing on remains unknown to me.

They are seeking collaborations with projects like Metakey, Mandala, and Decentraland because they believe that the metaverse should not be limited to just one place but should be interconnected. I can align with this vision, so they earn +1 star in that aspect. However, apart from that, the project doesn't excite me at all.

The project in question appears to be solely a marketing ploy,

Lacking any valuable activities from the start until the end of 2022.

While the project seems to have restarted in early 2023 with the tide of AI - ChatGPT, the revised whitepaper does not indicate any expansion of the team to carry out the vision. Despite the release of Whitepaper versions, which detail three years of project development, there is no information available regarding the tokenomic economy.

Additionally, the project's community is almost ZERO, and there have been numerous complaints about the project's financial clearance before 2023.

In AI industry, Sophia does not receive high evaluations. If you have seen any of the things she has said, it is clear that if Sophia generated these responses herself, shes way beyond any state of the art AI chatbot. Hanson Robotics is a for-profit company, and if they had truly achieved such a feat, they could make a significant profit by producing personal assistants and similar products. However, this does not appear to be the case. Therefore, I do not trust any project involving Sophia and her team.

The project in question appears to be solely a marketing ploy, 

- Lacking any valuable activities from the start until the end of 2022. 

- While the project seems to have restarted in early 2023 with the tide of AI - ChatGPT, the revised whitepaper does not indicate any expansion of the team to carry out the vision. Despite the release of Whitepaper versions, which detail three years of project development, there is no information available regarding the tokenomic economy. 

- Additionally, the project's community is almost ZERO, and there have been numerous complaints about the project's financial clearance before 2023. 

In AI industry, Sophia does not receive high evaluations. If you have seen any of the things she has said, it is clear that if Sophia generated these responses herself, shes way beyond any state of the art AI chatbot. Hanson Robotics is a for-profit company, and if they had truly achieved such a feat, they could make a significant profit by producing personal assistants and similar products. However, this does not appear to be the case. Therefore, I do not trust any project involving Sophia and her team.

Brian Pham

The management team of Hanson Robotic boasts experienced individuals such as

David Handson, the CEO, has a strong interest in humanoid robots. Handson has created various robotic heads, including a humanoid head resembling himself in 1995, K-Bot in 2004, and Sophia, his most famous production.

SingularityNET's CEO, Ben Goertzel, has over 30 years of experience in artificial intelligence and is credited with popularizing Artificial General Intelligence around 2002.

However, there is no information available about the execution team of the company. The project's whitepaper describes its product as a technologically advanced one. Compared to other similar projects such as Gala, they have more than 350 people working on and here Sophia only has a management team. This lack of balance is not ideal and not reflective of the reality of a project like this.

Plus, you can see these team members also involved in other projects of SingularityNET indicating that there is no dedicated workforce for Sophia project

The management team of Hanson Robotic boasts experienced individuals such as 

- David Handson, the CEO, has a strong interest in humanoid robots. Handson has created various robotic heads, including a humanoid head resembling himself in 1995, K-Bot in 2004, and Sophia, his most famous production. 

- SingularityNET's CEO, Ben Goertzel, has over 30 years of experience in artificial intelligence and is credited with popularizing Artificial General Intelligence around 2002. 

However, there is no information available about the execution team of the company. The project's whitepaper describes its product as a technologically advanced one. Compared to other similar projects such as Gala, they have more than 350 people working on and here Sophia only has a management team. This lack of balance is not ideal and not reflective of the reality of a project like this.

Plus, you can see these team members also involved in other projects of SingularityNET indicating that there is no dedicated workforce for Sophia project

The team of SophiaVERSE could reach great heights, in full potential, but some need to step up their pace. It has been quiet for a long time, and Sophia wants to explore and some want to explore Sophia! Wait, that came out wrong.. Anyways..

The project is led by the visionary David Hanson and his team, which includes well-known members like Ed Keller, Carolyn Ayers, and Ben Goertzel. Their mission is to empower people to shape their own destinies while nurturing Sophia's intelligence.

They receive invaluable support from the talented Charles Darby, an Emmy-winning visual artist renowned for his work in movies such as "I, Robot" and "Harry Potter." I believe that this team possesses the capability to create a unique Metaverse experience, where AI and creativity come together on a dynamic platform.

The technical and visual aspects of the team mentioned above are awesome, as they are doing a great job so far. However, there is a need for improvement in terms of marketing communication (Stacey Engle !) and community engagement. Additionally, transparency regarding documentation, such as tokenomics, should be enhanced.

Jeroen

SophiaVerse has yet to make any significant noise in the crypto space, mainly due to the lack of marketing efforts by their team and marketing director, Stacey Engle.

However, I have to say their decision to appoint the world's most renowned AI robot, Sophia, as a Co-CEO could be seen as a brilliant marketing tactic. Leveraging Sophia's fame, advanced capabilities, and massive social media following of over 750,000, SophiaVerse has the potential to generate unparalleled publicity and create compelling content.

If executed effectively, this strategy could greatly enhance awareness and build excitement around SophiaVerse, ultimately driving its success. It is crucial for the team to put these wheels into motion soon and utilize their most valuable asset to unleash the project's marketing potential, the likes of which not many other projects in the space can achieve so quickly, otherwise it risks being wasted.

SophiaVerse has yet to make any significant noise in the crypto space, mainly due to the lack of marketing efforts by their team and marketing director, Stacey Engle. 

However, I have to say their decision to appoint the world's most renowned AI robot, Sophia, as a Co-CEO could be seen as a brilliant marketing tactic. Leveraging Sophia's fame, advanced capabilities, and massive social media following of over 750,000, SophiaVerse has the potential to generate unparalleled publicity and create compelling content. 

If executed effectively, this strategy could greatly enhance awareness and build excitement around SophiaVerse, ultimately driving its success. It is crucial for the team to put these wheels into motion soon and utilize their most valuable asset to unleash the project's marketing potential, the likes of which not many other projects in the space can achieve so quickly, otherwise it risks being wasted.

Jeppopo

The SophiaVerse team looks vastly experienced, with Sophia and David Hanson (also CEO of Hanson Robotics) leading the team. The continued breakdown of the team, however experienced, have not provided much quantifiable data for review.

There are 2 Tokenomists in the team, Marcello Mari and Mario Casiraghi (also co-founders of SingularityDAO), however we still do not see anything related to Tokenomics apart from the utility and the dual-token model.

Marcello Mari - https://www.linkedin.com/in/marcellomari/?originalSubdomain=ae
Mario Casiraghi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/macasiraghi/?originalSubdomain=ae

Bill Inman is the Head of Marketing with Stacey Engle as the Marketing Director, but the Marketing aspect of the project falls relatively short of expectation, even with the entrepreneurial mind of them, and Stacey previously being the Director of Marketing of Fierce Inc, a development and training company.

Bill Inman - https://www.linkedin.com/in/billinman/
Stacey - https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceyengle/

Lastly, most of the team are co-founders/founders of other businesses/projects as well, and it might be a case where the efforts are currently focused on other businesses at the present due to the bear market, and only rotating back to SophiaVerse when market conditions improve and AI/Metaverse thematics come back into play.

The SophiaVerse team looks vastly experienced, with Sophia and David Hanson (also CEO of Hanson Robotics) leading the team. The continued breakdown of the team, however experienced, have not provided much quantifiable data for review.

There are 2 Tokenomists in the team, Marcello Mari and Mario Casiraghi (also co-founders of SingularityDAO), however we still do not see anything related to Tokenomics apart from the utility and the dual-token model. 

Marcello Mari - https://www.linkedin.com/in/marcellomari/?originalSubdomain=ae
Mario Casiraghi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/macasiraghi/?originalSubdomain=ae

Bill Inman is the Head of Marketing with Stacey Engle as the Marketing Director, but the Marketing aspect of the project falls relatively short of expectation, even with the entrepreneurial mind of them, and Stacey previously being the Director of Marketing of Fierce Inc, a development and training company. 

Bill Inman - https://www.linkedin.com/in/billinman/
Stacey - https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceyengle/

Lastly, most of the team are co-founders/founders of other businesses/projects as well, and it might be a case where the efforts are currently focused on other businesses at the present due to the bear market, and only rotating back to SophiaVerse when market conditions improve and AI/Metaverse thematics come back into play.

Adrian

I wonder if SophiaVerse would ever have a collaboration with current major AI players such as OpenAI to work on expanding their collective efforts or to integrate GPT/Generative Art Ideas into SAIL, possibly as a questline for rewards. This could possibly assist in increasing the speed in which Sophia could scale to achieve full sentience, or to create an additional world within SAOS. This would be a huge onboarding and collaborative marketing effort that can bring even more eyes onto the platform.

The project utilizes two primary tokens: $SOPH and $GUARD.

$SOPH is used for various transactions such as buying and selling in-game assets, staking to earn rewards, completing tasks, accessing memberships, and upgrading features. Additionally, it offers GameFI features such as borrowing, lending, and collateralizing.

On the other hand, $GUARD is a governance token held by Sophia's Guardians who regulate the development of Sophia's self-consciousness and design the game's evolution. Its utility includes regulating Sophia's evolution into the singularity, establishing ecosystem constitutional principles, proposing amendments and new principles, and voting on disputes.

Although SOPH's utility seems beneficial for holders, GUARD's utility is not. Holders of GUARD should benefit from project growth by providing them with a share in project revenue, not just proposing or voting. Plus, the lack of important information such as token distribution, release schedule, and other specifics is concerning about the seriousness of this project, especially since the project is three years old and has already released two versions of its white paper. This lack of effort may cause some to view the project as too meager, resulting in a rating of two stars from me.

Tokenomic info: page 41 in whitepaper https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/622c1e6eb1cd192ecedc6225/6461afa92bd50f8f9ec47599_SophiaVerse%20Whitepaper%20v2.0.pdf

The project utilizes two primary tokens: $SOPH and $GUARD. 

$SOPH is used for various transactions such as buying and selling in-game assets, staking to earn rewards, completing tasks, accessing memberships, and upgrading features. Additionally, it offers GameFI features such as borrowing, lending, and collateralizing. 

On the other hand, $GUARD is a governance token held by Sophia's Guardians who regulate the development of Sophia's self-consciousness and design the game's evolution. Its utility includes regulating Sophia's evolution into the singularity, establishing ecosystem constitutional principles, proposing amendments and new principles, and voting on disputes. 

Although SOPH's utility seems beneficial for holders, GUARD's utility is not. Holders of GUARD should benefit from project growth by providing them with a share in project revenue, not just proposing or voting. Plus, the lack of important information such as token distribution, release schedule, and other specifics is concerning about the seriousness of this project, especially since the project is three years old and has already released two versions of its white paper. This lack of effort may cause some to view the project as too meager, resulting in a rating of two stars from me.

Tokenomic info: page 41 in whitepaper https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/622c1e6eb1cd192ecedc6225/6461afa92bd50f8f9ec47599_SophiaVerse%20Whitepaper%20v2.0.pdf

Hanson Robotics and SingularityNet have partnered to create a project called SophiaVerse, which revolves around Sophia, a humanoid robot. The project includes Sophia's AI Lab (SAIL), AI Sentience Code, AI Sentience Wallet, Sophia's Age of Singularities (SAOS), and SophiaDAO (SODAO) across the emerging web3 environment. The SAOS component is a digital story-scape set 20 years in the future, where machines awaken as AGI and strive for superintelligence. During the 2040s, various species of Singularities emerge, some of which are good, bad, mysterious, or dangerous. Some, like Sophia, care about humans. Sophia requires our assistance in preventing humanity from descending into chaos, as different machine species become increasingly intelligent and fast in surprising ways.

The project was launched in 2021, but the roadmap was revised following the impact of ChatGPT, a large language model that utilizes AI for natural text conversations with users. ChatGPT gained popularity in early 2023, and two months later, version 2 of the project whitepaper was released. It remains to be seen if this is a response to current trends or a serious effort to upgrade Sophia to the next level. Another review will be necessary to determine the project's true intentions.

In the scope of the idea (excluding the feasibility of AI technology), this scenario is similar to those presented in other machine stories such as Matrix or Terminator which we saw more than 20 years ago so nothing is new. I shall give 3 stars to the concept.

Hanson Robotics and SingularityNet have partnered to create a project called SophiaVerse, which revolves around Sophia, a humanoid robot. The project includes Sophia's AI Lab (SAIL), AI Sentience Code, AI Sentience Wallet, Sophia's Age of Singularities (SAOS), and SophiaDAO (SODAO) across the emerging web3 environment. The SAOS component is a digital story-scape set 20 years in the future, where machines awaken as AGI and strive for superintelligence. During the 2040s, various species of Singularities emerge, some of which are good, bad, mysterious, or dangerous. Some, like Sophia, care about humans. Sophia requires our assistance in preventing humanity from descending into chaos, as different machine species become increasingly intelligent and fast in surprising ways. 

The project was launched in 2021, but the roadmap was revised following the impact of ChatGPT, a large language model that utilizes AI for natural text conversations with users. ChatGPT gained popularity in early 2023, and two months later, version 2 of the project whitepaper was released. It remains to be seen if this is a response to current trends or a serious effort to upgrade Sophia to the next level. Another review will be necessary to determine the project's true intentions.

In the scope of the idea (excluding the feasibility of AI technology), this scenario is similar to those presented in other machine stories such as Matrix or Terminator which we saw more than 20 years ago so nothing is new. I shall give 3 stars to the concept.

The community associated with a three-year project is notably small. Specifically,
Twitter account has only amassed 8,000 followers and has produced a mere 76 tweets since its inception on April 24th. Unfortunately, these tweets are generally unremarkable and receive very little engagement, ranging from several hundred to a couple thousand views.

Telegram group, which was established in September 2021, currently has 2,600 members. However, there is little activity within the group beyond simple greetings. Upon closer inspection, it is apparent that there have been numerous periods of disruption. Additionally, a number of issues have been raised, such as shown in Figure 1, but the responses to these inquiries have been unremarkable.

Finally, Discord has only recently been created last month and currently has 400 approved members, as can be seen in figure 2

This leads me to believe that the project is merely riding the wave of the recent AI trend, lacking a proper long-term commitment. As a result, I can only give this project a one-star rating.

The community associated with a three-year project is notably small. Specifically, 
- Twitter account has only amassed 8,000 followers and has produced a mere 76 tweets since its inception on April 24th. Unfortunately, these tweets are generally unremarkable and receive very little engagement, ranging from several hundred to a couple thousand views. 

- Telegram group, which was established in September 2021, currently has 2,600 members. However, there is little activity within the group beyond simple greetings. Upon closer inspection, it is apparent that there have been numerous periods of disruption. Additionally, a number of issues have been raised, such as shown in Figure 1, but the responses to these inquiries have been unremarkable. 

- Finally, Discord has only recently been created last month and currently has 400 approved members, as can be seen in figure 2

This leads me to believe that the project is merely riding the wave of the recent AI trend, lacking a proper long-term commitment. As a result, I can only give this project a one-star rating.

Apart from tapping onto Sophia's popularity and recognition, I don't see that they have done much, if not any marketing on SophiaVerse. Currently on their Twitter the only tweets are explanations regarding the SophieVerse, such as what SAOS is, their Wallet and uses, an Introduction to SAIL, and how the Sentience Code works. It would've been more interesting if they are partnered/invested in AI/Metaverse focused platforms/firms, but I'm assuming they are unable to do so because of a lack of token specifics and details.

Assuming that they are targeting for launch very soon, they are severely lacking in marketing. The only notable update is being mentioned in Binance's AI x Crypto Report as a Case study for "Improving the Metaverse Experience).

Report - https://research.binance.com/static/pdf/AI-Crypto-Exploring-Use-Cases-and-Possibilities.pdf (Page 18)

They do have a Marketing Director (Stacey Engle) on their team though.

Apart from tapping onto Sophia's popularity and recognition, I don't see that they have done much, if not any marketing on SophiaVerse. Currently on their Twitter the only tweets are explanations regarding the SophieVerse, such as what SAOS is, their Wallet and uses, an Introduction to SAIL, and how the Sentience Code works. It would've been more interesting if they are partnered/invested in AI/Metaverse focused platforms/firms, but I'm assuming they are unable to do so because of a lack of token specifics and details.

Assuming that they are targeting for launch very soon, they are severely lacking in marketing. The only notable update is being mentioned in Binance's AI x Crypto Report as a Case study for "Improving the Metaverse Experience). 

Report - https://research.binance.com/static/pdf/AI-Crypto-Exploring-Use-Cases-and-Possibilities.pdf (Page 18)

They do have a Marketing Director (Stacey Engle) on their team though.

For investors that are looking to buy the tokens hoping for an appreciation of value, there is nothing that is available at the time to look out for in terms of allocations - how much does the team get out of the 1B tokens? Is there a cliff/vesting schedule? What is the percentage allocated to the project for "earning" the tokens via completing tasks?

I read their whitepaper, went through every single channel on their discord, read the chat literally from top to bottom as well as the Help & Support Q&A section of the discord, and I still was unable to find out any information about the tokenomics apart from utility for SOPH and GUARD:

Ecosystem Currency
Access to events (such as lotteries, skins)
GameFi functions
In-game Governance (the whitepaper does not talk about this)

Lastly - they mentioned that "when Sophia reaches full sentience, all GUARD tokens (governance token) will be in her hands to do as she pleases".  What if Sophia decides to become a bad actor? I understand their confidence post sentience, but a governing board should still in place and not allow a single decision maker for any project.

It is mostly a blur at the moment, and if they are targeting a launch in June (as shared on their Telegram), it would be a tough sell without such information.

It is an exciting project with potential and significant buzz, but the team is not as focused on the metaverse and game building instead of providing specific tokenomics - which is worrying if I were to look into investing or buying their tokens when launched.

For investors that are looking to buy the tokens hoping for an appreciation of value, there is nothing that is available at the time to look out for in terms of allocations - how much does the team get out of the 1B tokens? Is there a cliff/vesting schedule? What is the percentage allocated to the project for "earning" the tokens via completing tasks?

I read their whitepaper, went through every single channel on their discord, read the chat literally from top to bottom as well as the Help & Support Q&A section of the discord, and I still was unable to find out any information about the tokenomics apart from utility for SOPH and GUARD:  

- Ecosystem Currency
- Access to events (such as lotteries, skins)
- GameFi functions
- In-game Governance (the whitepaper does not talk about this)

Lastly - they mentioned that "when Sophia reaches full sentience, all GUARD tokens (governance token) will be in her hands to do as she pleases".  What if Sophia decides to become a bad actor? I understand their confidence post sentience, but a governing board should still in place and not allow a single decision maker for any project.

It is mostly a blur at the moment, and if they are targeting a launch in June (as shared on their Telegram), it would be a tough sell without such information. 

It is an exciting project with potential and significant buzz, but the team is not as focused on the metaverse and game building instead of providing specific tokenomics - which is worrying if I were to look into investing or buying their tokens when launched.

Firstly, I am extremely confused on why a quick link to their Twitter is only available at the bottom of their site, instead of up there with Telegram and Discord. Twitter is one the core spaces for engagement and updates with the Crypto community, and it is definitely a misplay on their part to leave it on the bottom.

More can definitely be done to engage and build up the community, as it feels like there are currently more questions than answers provided - not a healthy sign for communities.

Telegram - 2.6k members, and there is relatively active engagement of the community by Jon (who is a part of SDAO, and also the owner of the telegram group).  There is a Ben Goertzel within the group that also assists to engage in the community but however is not an admin (I wonder why; perhaps he's not the actual person).

Discord - around 5k members, 627 online. The community are able to raise questions through their Help & Support, but personally, I feel that the questions are answered with a lot of ambiguity by the admins - not providing much of a roadmap or specifics on the network used, or the utility of the NFTs. It kind of makes me wonder if the team are still uncertain about the paths and utility, and are hopping on the Metaverse/AI train for the launch first, and then dig into the specifics after the community is formed by tapping into the popularity of Sophia. However they also shared that they are rebuilding the Discord ahead of the launch, so more questions might be answered after the rebuilding.

They also have Youtube, Facebook and Instagram as well, but it was not provided as a quick link, only I found out about them through their Discord links (Although it's for Sophia instead of SophieVerse)

Links as follows:
Discord - https://discord.gg/sophiaverse
Telegram Community - https://t.me/sophia_verse
Twitter - https://twitter.com/sophiaverse
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/realsophiarobot
Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/@sophiaverse
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/realsophiarobot

Firstly, I am extremely confused on why a quick link to their Twitter is only available at the bottom of their site, instead of up there with Telegram and Discord. Twitter is one the core spaces for engagement and updates with the Crypto community, and it is definitely a misplay on their part to leave it on the bottom.

More can definitely be done to engage and build up the community, as it feels like there are currently more questions than answers provided - not a healthy sign for communities. 

Telegram - 2.6k members, and there is relatively active engagement of the community by Jon (who is a part of SDAO, and also the owner of the telegram group).  There is a Ben Goertzel within the group that also assists to engage in the community but however is not an admin (I wonder why; perhaps he's not the actual person). 

Discord - around 5k members, 627 online. The community are able to raise questions through their Help & Support, but personally, I feel that the questions are answered with a lot of ambiguity by the admins - not providing much of a roadmap or specifics on the network used, or the utility of the NFTs. It kind of makes me wonder if the team are still uncertain about the paths and utility, and are hopping on the Metaverse/AI train for the launch first, and then dig into the specifics after the community is formed by tapping into the popularity of Sophia. However they also shared that they are rebuilding the Discord ahead of the launch, so more questions might be answered after the rebuilding.

They also have Youtube, Facebook and Instagram as well, but it was not provided as a quick link, only I found out about them through their Discord links (Although it's for Sophia instead of SophieVerse)

Links as follows:
Discord - https://discord.gg/sophiaverse
Telegram Community - https://t.me/sophia_verse
Twitter - https://twitter.com/sophiaverse
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/realsophiarobot
Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/@sophiaverse
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/realsophiarobot

SophiaVERSE SOPH

Gamified Metaverse