You can observe that this team has a well-thought-out project. Well J, why give it a 2-star rating then? Well, I'm glad you asked.

Firstly, let me clarify that this game doesn't align with my personal preferences. Indie games often share similar characteristics, with a few exceptions here and there. There's still a considerable amount of information missing, such as documents and details about the purpose of their token.

On the positive side, I appreciate that the game won't be pay-to-win, and as I mentioned before, the overall concept of ranking and tournaments is well-designed.

Regarding the roadmap, it could be more specific and follow the "SMART" criteria, where each stage is defined by a timeframe, be it a week, month, quarter, or year. Being a nominee somewhere in 2021 doesn't provide much insight, but the presence of strong partners does carry some weight. However, it's important to understand the nature of these partnerships, as nowadays, even mundane collaborations like lending out a pencil are considered as partnerships.

Lastly, I couldn't find any content on the Firegecko website, which is why I'm unable to meet Firegecko. Show Less

 1

Disclaimer: The content presented on this website, including any analyses, reviews, and ratings, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. crowd.news does not endorse or recommend any financial transactions or investments based on the information available on this platform. Visitors to this site should perform their own due diligence and consult with a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. crowd.news is not liable for any actions taken, financial or otherwise, based on information or links from this website.