There's something off about this idea to me
I think they're focusing on smart contract protocols for stable coins that allow people to easily create stable coins backed by multiple crypto assets. The idea being that stable coins backed by multiple assets are safer because any failing component can be switched out. I'm not sure if that's how it works though..
They have a stable coin backed by TUSD, PAX and USDC, but apparently anyone could create a token with different compositions in the future. They say being backed by multiple assets allows them to switch out an asset if it fails. I'm pretty skeptical about this. I'm not sure how you switch out the bad part if that part has no value anymore. The way I see it, you're basically diversifying risk.
Example: Let's say you have 3 stable tokens, one backed by luna, one backed by USDT and one backed by half Luna and half USDT. Sure, the one backed by both will only fail half if either token fails. but it also has a much higher chance of failing. Once Luna has failed you can't easily exchange that part, because your Luna has no value anymore. Maybe the idea is to add more and more currencies, so the failing one becomes only a small part. Then it would be like a stable coin pegged to the value of crypto itself. Which at least for now is also not very stable.
I really don't know. So I'll give it 3 stars.
While the idea seems off to me, they seem to be getting some traction with onboarding users in Venezuela. So maybe they should be more about making crypto usable and bringing it to the people rather than stable coin technology. If they said they're an easy to use wallet with a lot of users and progress in many countries, then that would be more interesting. Show Less