This doesn't smell right. As I read through the website, it's classic word salad and poor English. Red flags for me.
Next, they talk about creating blockchain apps that can be used by people who don't own the base crypto. That isn't a benefit. There are already plenty of great web apps that don't use a blockchain or crypto. Proposing that users shouldn't be at least minimally invested in the blockchain is a step backwards, not an innovation, IMO.
Another thing that bothers me about this is what they keep referring to as the "super node." Now, I don't know if this is just their bad English, or me just not understanding, but the way I read that is the way they achieve such high scalability is by having centralized servers. If that is true, then that's worse than Bitcoin.
The one positive trait that I saw on their site is that they claim that they have the data, smart contracts and transactions on one chain. If that's true and it's implemented well, then that would be a big positive for the project.
But in summary, I don't see this as being better than something like BitcoinSV. In fact, $SPACE appears to be worse in many ways.
The tokenomics could make this a good short-term trade. One star for that. But I don't see it succeeding as a long-term project. Show Less