In DeFi, the art of tokenomics design is pivotal, often dictating whether a token will thrive or falter.
A really interesting example I've gone deep into involves the interaction between Coinweb, a cross-chain protocol, and CWAP SWAP, a cross-chain DEX application, through their innovative dual-token system.
This setup looks to have effectively unleashed the potential of the economic flywheel, creating an ecosystem where both tokens can grow and support each other.
Please keep in mind that I don't know what the FDV of $CWAP will be at launch and I am purely making a low assumption on this to make it more than realistic. Everything else has been picked up from what the people behind CWAP have been saying and published.
Let's get into it.
The Tokenomics Model
$CWEB (Infrastructure token): Used as collateral for cross-chain transfers in the Coinweb Protocol (that CWAP is built on), and fees are collected from the collateral.
$CWAP (Application token): Grants access to the DEX’s fee pool (amongst other things). Users can burn $CWAP to claim a portion of the fees collected in $CWEB.
This creates a self-reinforcing loop where arbitrage opportunities can drive continuous buy pressure and price appreciation for each $CWAP token.
The Reflexive Arbitrage Mechanism
The DEX collects 10 bps in fees on every trade, accumulating a growing fee pool of $CWEB. $CWAP holders can burn 1% of the supply to claim 1% of the total fee pool. If the value of the fee pool exceeds $CWAP's market cap, an arbitrage opportunity emerges:
- Traders buy $CWAP on exchanges.
- They burn $CWAP to receive $CWEB from the fee pool.
- If the fee pool is worth more than 100% of $CWAP's FDV, arbitrageurs gain an instant profit.
- This process will likely push more buy orders on exchanges, reduce $CWAP’s supply, and increase its price per token drastically.
Bull Case Scenarios Based on Trading Volume
The key driver for this system is trading volume on the DEX. At different daily volume levels, here’s what happens to $CWAP’s valuation (if we assume a super low $10m is FDV at launch):
Daily Volume = 📊 Annual Fee Pool ($CWEB) = 💰 FDV increase of $CWAP = 🚀
📊 $40m 💰 $14.6M 🚀 1.46x of FDV
📊 $100m 💰 $36.5M 🚀 3.65x of FDV
📊 $200m 💰 $73M 🚀 7.3x of FDV
📊 $300m 💰 $109.5M 🚀 10.95x of FDV
Its FDV could rise dramatically as long as volume becomes high, creating a reflexive flywheel effect.
(If pricing is 95% cheaper than competitors (same price as CEXs), and execution is faster, there's no real reason why this DEX could not become the biggest cross-chain DEX out there.)
Why This Model Works
-
Continuous Buy Pressure: The arbitrage mechanism ensures constant demand for $CWAP as long as the fee pool is larger than its market cap. When the fee pool is below FDV in value, it won't take long until it becomes higher again as fees will be generated constantly.
-
Deflationary Supply: $CWAP’s supply reduces with each burn, increasing scarcity and pushing the price per token higher.
-
Compounding Growth: As volume grows, fees increase, making $CWAP even more attractive for arbitrageurs.
-
This is just pure math of arb opportunity, and not even considering any other functionality / pumpamentals.
You may think "This sounds bad for $CWEB", well... it is the complete opposite, it creates a bull case for this token as well. Here's why:
Liquidity providers supplying collateral in $CWEB must continuously buy more $CWEB to maintain their liquidity position as fees are collected from their collateral. This creates sustained buy pressure, offsetting potential sell pressure from fee-driven $CWAP burns, reinforcing price stability and long-term demand for $CWEB. AND, this doesn't even take into account what will happen to $CWEB before it even makes economic sense to try to access the fee pool.
My thoughts on this
This analysis strictly focuses on the mathematical arbitrage opportunity created by the tokenomics, without factoring in additional narratives, ecosystem growth, user adoption, speculative demand, or any of the other burn mechanisms and value-capturing functionality $CWAP has.
If CWAP gains traction beyond just the arbitrage mechanism - through integrations, partnerships, increased liquidity depth, or retail/institutional adoption - these factors could further amplify the price appreciation and sustainability of both $CWAP and $CWEB.
Will this tokenomics flywheel take off? The answer depends on sustained trading volume and market participants recognizing the powerful incentives at play. Show Less
