I would rate this project with 3 stars, as the tokenomics appear solid, but not entirely aligned with my preferences.

Pros:

  • The diverse allocation towards ecosystem development (53.18%) demonstrates a strong commitment to expanding the project's ecosystem, potentially attracting more users and partners.
  • Allocating 13.08% to community rewards, including NFTs and other incentives, is positive for fostering an engaged and active community, which many projects struggle with nowadays.
  • The allocation of 7.50% for market maker support is excellent, indicating support for liquidity and trading on the platform, which can attract traders and enhance liquidity.

Neutral: I remain neutral on the 4-year vesting period for the team and early investors. It seems standard and sufficient, not particularly special.

Cons: My main concerns are the 18.54% allocation to ecosystem partners and the relatively high 19.32% allocation to the core team. The partner allocation lacks clarity regarding who these partners are and what they will contribute to the project.

Conclusion: I might be a bit critical, but I would give it 3 stars. While there are no glaring issues, I believe the allocation could be more balanced. I understand it's related to their earning model not involving commissions, but it does concentrate a significant amount of power for their tokens, and this contradicts the idea of a decentralized exchange imo. Show Less


Disclaimer: The content presented on this website, including any analyses, reviews, and ratings, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. crowd.news does not endorse or recommend any financial transactions or investments based on the information available on this platform. Visitors to this site should perform their own due diligence and consult with a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. crowd.news is not liable for any actions taken, financial or otherwise, based on information or links from this website.