There is one thing about this project that seems confusing. What's the reason for the team to stay anonymous, even after the current success of a project? It's not the answer if it's obviously related to regulatory risk, since the team should consider this risk anyway in the future. At the same time, no signals that the team is somehow related to manipulating the system (well-distributed holders, transparent on-chain data, and so forth)
Eventually, in the age of bad actors and crypto meltdowns, its not a good idea to stay anonymous without any "suspicious" intentions. So only 4stars.
Holders sources(token exists in both Polygon & Arbitrum): https://arbiscan.io/token/0x18c11FD286C5EC11c3b683Caa813B77f5163A122#balances https://polygonscan.com/token/0xE5417Af564e4bFDA1c483642db72007871397896#balances
Will update this review if any new public information comes to light. Show Less
