The investor deck showcase the core idea and potential on providing liquidity to certain niches of RWA. Hotels and Airlines cancelations are interesting but they get canceled and the costumer usually pays a fee automatically. There is no study addressing that those individuals would try to cancel in a viable time for the companies to fill-in the gaps. (that should help) But the secondary markets for tickets are a great niche but a 'me too' solution. Why a token? Well, BUK really needs a token? IMO, the platform would benefit if it used a Stablecoin as a fee to provide service? With account abstraction to well known Web2 platforms to enable the secondary market to benefit from a Web3 solution with minimum hassle. Three stars to looking at being a infrastructure provider. Minus two to a forced need of a token the will only serve as friction to web2 marketplaces. There is no explanation on the 'already available tokenized assets' on the investor deck. Show Less

 1

Disclaimer: The content presented on this website, including any analyses, reviews, and ratings, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. crowd.news does not endorse or recommend any financial transactions or investments based on the information available on this platform. Visitors to this site should perform their own due diligence and consult with a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. crowd.news is not liable for any actions taken, financial or otherwise, based on information or links from this website.